Friday, December 28, 2012

The Progressive Mind.

  With all the anti-Second Amendment hysteria going on and the outright revulsion that the left feels for folks who arm themselves with semi-auto military-pattern rifles, (to say nothing of their horror at common folks getting CHLs and paying a fee to express their human and constitutional right to be armed), I got to wondering:

The Brave One:  Vigilante Justice with illegal gun in NYC.  She gets caught...and corrupts the police into going ALONG with her murderous rampage!!

Bronson, Death Wish:  More vigilante murders in NYC, (with especially galling bongo background music!)

  What does a liberal think and feel when they are confronted by something like "Open Range" on the big screen?  In "Open Range" Robert Duval and Mr. Dances with Wolves get crosswise with the local businessmen, wander into town and KILL the Sheriff, all the deputies that don't run and a couple of the most prominent citizens.  With unregistered guns.  Shoot them to DEATH.  Or consider Robin Hood, in any of it's silver screen incarnations:  These national forest-squatting-drunk-freebooters arm themselves with longbows and puncture anyone in the uniform of duly appointed and elected office, finally killing the actual acting head of government and his lackeys to a man.  They STEAL anything that chances by and pass it out to the locals.  Braveheart:  Same thing.  Badly-dressed drunken ruffians rebel against God and King and hack, skewer, gnaw, choke and bludgeon the living hell out of anyone who has managed to get a government job.

Open Range: Murder of Public Officials.

Braveheart:  More murder of public servants.

  Do liberals pull for the Sheriff of Nottingham?  For the Nazis against Schindler? ( He's LYING TO YOU!!  He's helping the Joooooosss!!!!!).  For the Nazis, (who are mostly making the trains run on time in France), against Tom Hanks and Private Ryan?  (They hate the US military)   For almost anyone against Clint Eastwood?  For absolutely anyone against Bronson and John Wayne?  Against any outlaws with unregistered illegal assault-longbows that they twang away with at anyone who is just trying to make the system work?  (Longbows and swords were forbidden to common folks- only the King's Men could carry arms, so this is a direct parallel to what Democrats currently want.)  They MUST.  It's what they BELIEVE in their heart of hearts.

Robin Hood with an untagged deer, illegal weapon, no ID and forced entry.

The English are not immune.

  In "Star Wars" one of the main heroes doesn't work for anyone and carries an unlicensed, unregistered sidearm with which he kills a hundred or more government security workers.  At random. They are following legal orders and trying to DO THEIR JOBS.  Is there anyone a liberal would hate WORSE than the murderous and violent Han Solo?  (Except maybe Leia and the Wookie for being traitors to their races and sex?)

  Can you imagine the horror of watching  "The Patriot?"

The Tomahawk Scene

  This man is killing English Soldiers IN UNIFORM who are administering the Kings Colonies.

  Do you think that a liberal watches "Spartacus" and feels that, all in all, Kirk Douglas pretty much got what he deserved?  They HATE common citizens with arms.  They LOVE Big Government.

"I'm Spartacus!"

  Can we just have universal biometric ID and end this nonsense?

Eastwood: Racist with an illegal unregistered gun in Detroit.

  What awfulness when the Death Star goes up.  And then ANOTHER Death Star, built with bonds let to the Raffinians and 44% over budget, goes up in the sequel.  OMG.

Star Wars: Destruction of Government Property and death of all staff.

Death Star:  Budget and staff lost in terrorist attack.

  This has been going on for decades.

In Texas:  Death of public safety personel and destruction of church by outlaw forces.

Not content with the classics, they remake the movie time after time.

  The government employees take it on the chin from illegally armed murderous outlaws!  What an awful thing this must be to witness year after year, episode after episode on the big screen!

Heavily-armed, diseased, drunk, drug-abusing, gambling, capitalist scum murdering whomever they please.


Bob said...

Not certain I agree on commoners in England not carrying arms, Robert. The Assize of Arms of 1181, promulgated by Henry II, specified that both knights and minor landholders were required to own arms, and to bear them in battle when called upon by the King. The Assize doesn't mention serfs or the yeoman class, but other historical records of the time note that archery butts were set up at most towns and the yeomanry were required to be proficient in the use of the bow.

Old NFO said...

Well done comparison Robert, and one side note- Who FUNDED and MADE most of those movies? Liberals in Hollywierd... Thanks!

Robert Langham said...

Several English rebellions fought mostly over arms for common folks. As hard to stamp out long bows as it is to outlaw firearms.